Disc disease, or disc degeneration, is a condition caused by the degeneration of the intervertebral disc and the symptoms that arise from it. Disc degeneration is a natural process that, in many cases, does not present any symptoms. For example, by the age of 50, radiological findings of disc disease are expected in more than 50% of individuals.
Genetics play a significant role (similar to how skin aging affects the appearance of wrinkles), but environmental factors also contribute, such as heavy lifting, exposure to vibrations, smoking, etc. The intervertebral discs have a limited ability to heal from potential injuries due to the small number of cells inside the disc and the lack of blood vessels in the area (similar to the meniscus in the knee).
Pain is primarily localized in the lower back (low back pain – lumbago) and may radiate to the buttocks and the back of the thighs, reaching just above the knees but not extending to the foot. Symptoms worsen when sitting or standing/walking for extended periods and improve when lying down. Movement of the lower back (lumbar spine) is limited and painful.
The patient does not find relief by bending forward; in fact, this may worsen the pain due to the increased pressure inside the disc. During examination, sensation, mobility, and reflexes are usually normal.
MRI scans show disc degeneration, including a reduction in disc height and changes in its signal (the disc appears black instead of white, as shown in Figure 1). However, these findings are not exclusive to symptomatic individuals, as they are commonly seen in asymptomatic patients of all ages.
Treatment is primarily conservative. In the acute phase, when pain is intense and interferes with daily activities, the following measures are recommended:
Avoid
In the chronic phase of disc disease, regular exercise is essential:
The most common minimally invasive intervention is a cortisone injection, either into the epidural space or into the spinal joints. However, for lower back pain alone, cortisone injections are less effective than they are for leg pain caused by a herniated disc.
Other minimally invasive procedures involve destroying the painful disc tissue to make it painless. This can be done through:
Unfortunately, none of these methods have been proven effective. In some cases, pain may worsen after the intervention.
A particular mention should be made regarding Discogel injections inside the disc. In Greece, Discogel is overused despite a lack of scientific evidence supporting its effectiveness (PubMed research). An even more outdated treatment is laser disc procedures, which have been banned in the U.S. due to their potential to worsen back pain.
In conclusion, apart from traditional cortisone injections, none of the minimally invasive disc procedures have proven their effectiveness, meaning their application is not justified despite their low risk.
When conservative treatment fails and pain persists, spinal fusion is the only solution. If disc disease affects one or two levels, surgery yields excellent results. However, a small percentage of patients do not experience pain relief after fusion surgery, making proper patient selection crucial.
Key criteria for surgical candidates:
In spinal fusion, the painful disc is removed, and the vertebrae are fused using bone grafts and screws to eliminate movement at that level. MRI scans help identify the affected disc, but no test can definitively confirm that a specific disc is the sole source of pain. Discography, once used in the past, is now considered unreliable.
A successful fusion requires the vertebrae to permanently bond and eliminate movement. This is achieved using anterior-posterior spinal fusion, involving disc removal, bone graft placement, and posterior screw stabilization.
Factors influencing success:
The surgical approach (whether from the back or abdomen) and the incision size (traditional or minimally invasive surgery) do not significantly impact the final outcome, as long as the fusion is successful. Navigation-assisted and robotic surgery, while promising, do not show a significant advantage for small fusions (1-2 levels).
Spinal fusion has a low complication rate, but possible issues include:
Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine has not gained the same acceptance as in the cervical spine. The goal of artificial discs is to remove the diseased disc while preserving motion. Potential advantages include protecting adjacent discs from wear and maintaining spinal movement.
However, FDA studies (IDE trials) show no significant difference in pain relief between total disc replacement and spinal fusion. Additionally, many artificial discs become immobile (“ankylosed”) within a decade.
Moreover, in cases of failed lumbar disc replacement, revision surgery is extremely difficult, if not impossible
Νοσοκομείο Υγεία